The source critic reads the book of genesis, for example, and asks, where did the author get this information. Introduction to the textual criticism of the old testament. Critical methods of bible interpretation flashcards quizlet. Henry otley beyer but such dates are contested by other scholars in the field of history. Source criticism seeks to identify independent source documents behind the present biblical texts. Redaction criticism redaktionsgeschichte has come to birth. Source criticism is the quest for the earliest sources which lie behind a given biblical text. Source criticism takes into consideration the sources being used and also the repetitions inconsistencies of the passage. A source criticism is a published source evaluation or information evaluation. Wenham cheltenham source criticism of the pentateuch has often been a subject of controversy. Further steps including form criticism and redaction criticism must.
An evaluation of historicalcritical methods with special reference to source criticism, tradition criticism, form criticism and redaction criticism. Source criticism, in biblical criticism, refers to the attempt to establish the sources used by the authors and redactors of a biblical text. Form criticism had been used in germany since about 1900 to explore some of. The jedp theory found its roots in jean astruc 16841766, who speculated that moses used existing written or oral sources in constructing genesis. If you have exercised faith in christ, then you are in the right place. Biblical source biblical interpretation britannica. Maragtas and kalantiaw codes cultures in the philippines. Gospel criticism source and form criticism page 2 ii. Rhetorical criticism in old testament studies 91 thus, there was a justifiable logic in m. In relation to a given purpose, a given information source may be more or less valid, reliable or relevant. Learn source criticism with free interactive flashcards. Redaction criticism oxford biblical studies online.
When scholars read genesis 1 and 2 they apply source criticism to explain why there are two very similar stories side by side in the same book, but which contain striking differences. A guide to reading the old testament, by corrine l. The term is also used as in the study of poetry, drama, and novels, as an attempt to understand the biblical writings as literature. Much of it began as an oral tradition which was finally written down after centuries of being passed down orally. Literary source criticism, for example, asks questions about the genesis of a text, while. This field of study came to prominence in the eighteenth century when jean astruc used the methods applied in source criticism to homers illiad to the text of genesis. They are source criticism, form criticism, tradition criticism, and redaction criticism. The source critic reads the book of genesis, for example, and.
Source criticism is a form of study used by some bible interpreters to help determine potential human sources used to influence or compile the text of a biblical book. The letters jedp are a designation used by scholars to identify the component parts or sources that they understand were used to compile the first five books of the old testament. Professor of oriental and old testament literature in princeton theological seminary 1895 edition published by charles scribners sons. Source criticism emerged out of work done on the old testament particularly the book. Most of the writings in the old testament are of anonymous authorship, and in many cases it is not known whether they were compiled by individuals or by. Source and redaction criticism chapter 3 methods for. Criticism of the sources refers to the attempt to establish the sources used by the author andor redactor of a final text. There have been various opinions as to whether these sources were written or oral traditions, and whether each. Form, source, and redaction criticism oxford handbooks. Tradition criticism, in the study of biblical literature, method of criticism of the hebrew bible old testament and the new testament that attempts to trace the developmental stages of the oral tradition, from its historical emergence to its literary presentation in scripture.
Biblical source, any of the original oral or written materials that, in compilation, came to constitute the bible of judaism and christianity. It is the oldest method of critical biblical study except for textual criticism. This article looks at form criticism, source literary criticism, and redaction criticism. It was first jean austruc who suggested that moses used different sources to compile pentateuch. Form criticism has as its field the study of materials produced by popular traditions. Source and form criticism of the bible essay example.
After the pentateuch had been analysed into its several sources j, e, d, p, it was some time before scholars took an interest in the scribes or archivists who must have combined the material. Redaction criticism is a study of the collection, orchestration, editing, and modification of biblical sources, often used to recreate the community and purposes of the authors at that time. The very specific meaning of the term pentateuchal criticism, as compared with that of other books, reveals the excessive dominance of source criticism in scholarship. The old testament was composed over a long period of time. It originated in the 18th century with the work of jean astruc, who adapted the methods already developed for investigating the texts of classical antiquity. A very old man with enormous wings by gabriel garcia marquez 5 1. We examine them when trying to find out what took place at. They do this through external and internal analysis. This method has been applied to texts of the old testament especially but not. Source criticism, in biblical criticism, refers to the attempt to establish the sources used by the. The aim of source and redaction criticism is to discern the history of the literary composition of the text. This method has been applied to texts of the old testament especially. Source criticism of the pentateuch has often been a subject of.
The following is a brief outline of the basic facts and principles. Broadly, source criticism is the interdisciplinary study. If the sources of an account can be identified, it is possible to learn a great deal. Source criticism has been applied to several parts of the tanakh the hebrew bible or old testament. Some interbiblical sources can be determined by virtue of the fact that the source is still extant, for example, where the books of chronicles quotes or retells the accounts of the books of samuel and kings. This involves the investigation and determination of the authorship and dates of each book of the old testament canon. An information source may be a document, a person, a speech, a fingerprint, a photo, an observation or anything used in order to obtain knowledge. Religious texts biblical criticism source criticism.
Also, purchase a readytouse source criticism worksheet for use with any primary or secondary source. This is the third of five chapters on the old testament and the reader, and discusses canonical criticism and old testament theology. Sociological criticism of the old testament religion online. This is a brief lesson in source criticism intended to teach people how to identify good and bad information. Rarely have the different approaches to the topic been more clearly illustrated than by the recent publications of two of the best known british old testament scholars.
An example of the use of source criticism is the famous pentateuch division between source j and e. The what and why of biblical criticism nt resources. Because of the wealth of materials and the difficulties of the many other languages involved, it is one of the most difficult sciences in bible study. A very old man with enormous wings university of missouri. Form criticism is a field of biblical studies that sees the bible as a collection of traditional stories and sayings or units, which were circulated orally and eventually strung together and preserved in writing.
Reconstructing the wording of the original text autograph by comparing handwritten manuscripts mss 2. Source criticism is needed to explain this sort of evidence, and it has not been displaced either by form criticism, which tries to explain how a story or saying was used in the oral tradition of the church before being incorporated into a source, or by redaction criticism, which seeks to analyse the new testament writers use of their sources. Each new form of biblical criticism has offered explanations for biblical features previously passed over or explained on the basis of common sense, prejudice or dogma. Choose from 171 different sets of source criticism flashcards on quizlet. There are prompts for each criticism skill with space for individual answers, as well as. Source criticism is the tool scholars use to figure out what sources, or materials, biblical authors drew on. In relation to a given purpose, a given information source.
So, this approach assumes that there are sources behind the texts, and these sources were composed by different authors. Form criticism, a method of biblical criticism that seeks to classify units of scripture into literary patterns such as love poems, parables, sayings, elegies, legends and that attempts to trace each type to its period of oral transmission. The purpose is to determine the original form and the. Literary criticism constitutes the first methodological step on the path to seeking the origin and provenance of a text. Form criticism is most associated with the work of german scholars martin dibelius 18831947 and rudolf bultmann 18841976, though it was developed by herman gunkel and first applied to the. This field of study came to prominence in the eighteenth century when jean astruc used the methods applied in source criticism to homers illiad. The form critics had in a way anticipated redaction criticism by recognizing that there is one sectionthe passion narrativewhich is a unity, with reliable topographical and chronological details, but with variations e. Kesslers early call for rhetorical criticism to act as the new home for literary criticism in biblical studies, to serve as a suitable rubric for the kind of biblical criticism which deals with the literary analysis of the massoretic text.
Form criticism, like source criticism, literary criticism, and redaction criticism, is a scientific method of interpreting the texts of the old testament. Where criticism has been negative, there have been aftereffects which deserve to be carefully examined. Four source theory of the torah by deacon bill nourse, ed. Source criticism sometimes referred to as literary criticism tries to identify the sources upon which a text relies. Source and redaction criticism are two related methodologies that come under the broader umbrella of the historical critical approach, which seeks to interpret texts within their original historical contexts. A readytouse table for source analysis and evaluation. Redaction criticism the elucidation of the theological outlook of the editors redactors of ot and nt books. Source criticism or information evaluation is the process of evaluating an information source, i. The value of source criticism is that it has increased our understanding of the literary relationship between the synoptic gospelsbut note that we have explicit statement that sources were used in their composition luke 1. But all felt they were faced wit bridginh th the difficulteg gap of y of twenty or thirty years which separated their sources from the lifetime of our lord.
One aspect of historical criticism, source criticism is particularly concerned with identifying potential sources and precursors of the text we have now. Source criticism studies the sources used by the inspired writers. The two areas of research could be treated separately. Form criticism attempts to determine literary patterns in scripture, isolate units of text, and trace each unit to its origin. The source can be a newspaper or an old church register. Once again, if you spot any errors please point them out and i will correct them. Form criticism appeared upon the scene and offered to throw light upon this period. Apr 10, 2018 there are four main methods under this approach. It first appeared in the seventieth and eighteenth centuries when scholars began to read the bible from a secular. Comparing source, form, redaction and literary criticism in. If you have not, then you need to heed the words of our lord, who said, for god so loved the. Genesis 69 is widely considered a prime example of the success of source criticism as a method of identifying distinct preexistent sources within a composite. For the most part, the synoptic gospels are treated separate from.
The purpose of this essay is to gain an appreciation of the many and various methods at the disposal of the biblical critic, and to apply a range of these methods to a particular old testament text. They are supposedly distinguishable by the use of the terms yahweh and elohim. Source and form criticism both attempt to get behind the text of the gospels in order to understand how the written gospels were formed. Textual criticism deals with hebrew and greek, not english translations. You must be able to critically scrutinize and evaluate the information you are about to use in your pieces of work. Free online bible library history of biblical criticism. Canonical criticism can be understood as a relatively recent proposal for reordering exegetical priorities, while old testament theology is usually seen as a summarizing discipline as old as modernity itself. Source criticism is perhaps most famous for what scholars call the documentary hypothesis. These four sources have been identified by biblical scholars by.
However, the questions that a source critic may ask differ from a form critic. Canonical criticism and old testament theology oxford. Regards the author of the text as editor of his her source materials redaction criticism attempts to explore the original social and cultural setting of a text through clues in the texts content and rhetoric, and through the analysis of other ancient evidence. Historicalcritical methods literarycritical methods textual criticism canonical criticism source criticism rhetorical criticism form criticism. The higher criticism of the pentateuch gordon college. Where biblical criticism has concentrated on a constructive examination of the text, valuable light has been shed on the meaning and setting of the books, with a consequent advantage to exegesis. We can best appreciate the controversy over sociological criticism of the bible by noting the impact of scientific method in the history of biblical studies. Source criticism is a specialized field of biblical studies that seeks to determine the sources used to develop the final form of the biblical text. Form criticism, brings out the fact that the judgment is made according to the form, but does not make clear that history is the aim of the study. This was the discovery that the first five books of the old testament. What source critics do source critics identify places in the gospels and acts where an evangelist may be drawing upon material that was already in writing. The document is dated in the 1225 according to prof. Genesis 69 is widely considered a prime example of the success of source criticism as a method of identifying distinct preexistent sources within a composite text, well suited to teaching this method to undergraduates.
Download a copy of the source criticism table for free in the store. Source criticism emerged out of work done on the old testament particularly the book of genesis by. Introduction in the field of old testament studies, one of the areas of concern for all scholars whether they be conservative or liberal is the matter of higher criticism. It was initially called higher criticism to distinguish it from lower or textual criticism, then called literary criticism because of its emphasis on written documents. It was first jean austruc who suggested that moses used different. Vi, 162 formerly called literary criticism or higher criticism, source criticism is a method of biblical study, which analyzes texts that are not the work of a single author but result from the combination of originally separate documents. As the name implies, source criticism seeks to identify the sources the gospel writers used when they wrote their gospels. It assumed the widely agreed conclusion of source criticism of the priority of mark and the view that the gospel of john was later than the other three but the aim was to penetrate into the period of church life before even the earliest sources had been written. Form criticism simply emphasizes this task for a particular purpose to recover the early stages of a biblical text.
1321 961 1426 954 1374 16 181 513 285 1138 94 470 283 749 192 1079 1241 1120 1329 223 122 1444 722 213 882 107 662 607 332 1485 1370 184 1038 1244 223 631 1213 346